Given that the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be reached, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
It is usually important to note that granting of seniority to a civil servant without the actual length of service almost violates all the service framework to be a civil servant inducted in Quality seventeen by claiming such benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher grade, which is neither the intention in the law nor in the equity. Read more
In the event the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and continue according to the regulation. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances with the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Obviously distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion involves a transfer to a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, within the other hand, supplies financial relief by positioning an employee in a higher pay out scale, without transforming their occupation duties or position. It is a mechanism designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained while in the same spend scale for an extended time, particularly when they absence alternatives for promotion. Upgradation is often a policy tool used to reduce the hardship of extensive-term stagnation. Read more
Because the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be achieved, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support of the Supreme Court, guaranteeing the enforcement of its judgments. As the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been reached, the decision in the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. Read more
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is really a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents of the boy or Lady do not approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they are able to Lower off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy who is a major, the pair is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by law.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's very well-settled that although thinking about the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should look at the merit of many of the eligible candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these eligible candidates who are found to get most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked by the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy check here about the part on the respondent department.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to comply with.
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government procedures for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and also to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. Consequently, this petition is admissible based on recognized court precedents, and also the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
Problems or Errors For those who encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a negative link or a portion of the opinion missing), please notify the eService Middle.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its original purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more